+ Check out this link to a law library's list of advocacy publications: A law librarian compiled a bibliography of books and materials on the general subject of Trial Advocacy. The content is limited to titles contained in the library of the Dickinson Law School and is therefore incomplete. Many of these books and materials are outdated and out-of-print; but the bibliography is fairly extensive and well done. It includes sections on general treatises, trial ethics, trial procedure, and trial strategy. At the bottom of the linked page, you will also find links to bibliographies of books and materials on subjects such as pretrial practice, evidence, and trial process, as well as a bibliography of law review articles and periodicals dealing with trial advocacy. There is also a page that will allow you to review titles related to specific areas of practice, e.g., criminal law.
+ NACDL makes some of its archived materials available without attaching $ signs: The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL), showing a sign of public spiritedness for the plight of struggling defenders, allows penurious non-members limited access some of its archived magazine articles without extracting coin of the realm. This method worked for me when I last checked it in 2008: go to their search page, type in "criminal" in the subject matter, then chose the drop down menu asking for "all results"; you'll get long list of magazine articles; you may have to cull through the list of fluffy p.r. and chest pounding pieces to find some monographs providing hard information relating to trial practice, but 15%-20% of the articles do have some substance. Compare the NACDL hide-the-ball policy with the generous open web site sharing policy of the New York State Defenders Association, e.g., NYSDA Practice Tips.
+ Amazon has employed a retired prosecutor to compile a lists of books they will sell the would be trial advocate: For rookies, for cross-examiners, etc. Caveat emptor.
+ Here's something for "O.J. case" fans: An incomplete bibliography of trial advocacy books compiled by a non-lawyer fan of the "O.J" murder case in the mid-90's and not updated.
+ This link will be useful to those who defend capital cases: If you are involved in capital defense, you should arrange to receive the Capital Defense Weekly.
+ You can subscribe to law journals devoted to trial practice: Two clinical law journals for practitioners and trial skills teachers are the Journal of Practical and Clinical Law (3X yearly), (517) 371-5140 ext. 4504 and the Clinical Law Review: A Journal of Lawyering and Legal Education (2X yearly), (212) 998-6434.
+ Those interested in psychiatry, psychology, medicine and law may be interested in these publications: Behavioral Sciences and the Law (4x yearly), State University of New York at Buffalo, (716) 645-2770; International Journal of Law and Psychiatry (4X yearly); Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law: Journal of Legal Medicine (4x yearly); Journal of Psychiatry & Law (4X yearly), (201) 569-5332; Law and Human Behavior (6X yearly).
+ Looking for Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews and Periodicals: Law Source is a good bet. Another good source for viewing and downloading of the full text of scholarly papers in law, including criminal law, is the SSRN Network; they have 85,000 papers available; you may view summaries of articles for free and may search by subject or by author. HeinOnLine, a paid subscription service, is another possibility. Finally, here is an Index to the Contents of Law Reviews; it even contains some hyperlinks to full text of some law review articles.
+ Some Financial Relief for Public Defenders & Legal Aid Lawyers: If you are a public defender or a legal aid lawyer with educational debt funded by the federal government, be aware of the College Cost Reduction and Access Act of 2007 (CCRAA), effective in September of 2007. The CCRAA has provisions for loan forgiveness for public servants after serving 120 months in a public-service job. Here's an article that seeks to explain the application of the Act, provisions of which apply to persons who were already in public service when the Act became effective.
+ The folks who sponsor statewide mock trial programs often put together a fairly good package of advocacy tips from the avialable literature. The result can be a bit of unoriginal mishmash dumbed down for highschoolers but sometimes it worth a lawyer's look. This one is in the latter category.
+ Rules and Statutes for Texas Prosecutors and Defenders: Federal Rules of Evidence, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Federal Statutes Re Procedure, Federal Crimes in Title 18 USC, Texas Rules of Evidence (with 2007 changes), Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Texas Penal Code
HERE'S THE CCJA BIBLIOGRAPHY
of
ADDITIONAL SOURCES
[I AM NOT A BIG FAN OF ABBREVIATIONS. SO BEFORE YOU CITE ONE OF THESE RESOURCES IN A BRIEF OR ACADEMIC ARTICLE, PLEASE DOUBLE CHECK AT THIS SITE WHICH PROVIDES PROPER BLUEBOOK ABBREVIATI0NS FOR VARIOUS LAW REVIEW AND LAW JOURNAL SOURCES. FOR MORE RESEARCH RESOURCES CONSULT THIS GUIDE TO CURRENT LAW REVIEW CONTENT.]
-Bauer, Gary, Addressing the Needs of Solo/Small Firm Practitioners through Law School Based Programs to Reduce Stress in Practice,- Several Approaches, 6 Thomas M. Cooley J. Prac. & Clinical L. 1 (2003).
-Beaudette, Marie, What Price Startup? To Launch a Law Practice Takes Guts and Time, But Money Matters Too, 26 Legal Times 25 (June 23, 2003).
-Biernath, Mark, One Year and Counting: Advice from a New Solo, 17 Crim. Justice 15 (2003).
-Leffler, David, Real Life, Solo Style, 20 GP Solo 71 (April-May 2003).
-Olmstead, John, Law Office Management Review Checklist, 5 Lawyer's Competitive Edge: The Journal of Law Office Economics and Management 1 ( September 2003).
-Tebo, Margaret, What Not to Buy:Setting Spending Priorities Is Key to Solo Success, 89 A.B.A.J. 42 (2003).
-Weston, William, Ethics Concerns In Shared Office Space, 20 GP Solo 40 (July-August 2003).
-Survival Guides for Solo and Small Firm Practices, 28 Law Prac. Mgmt. 30 (May-June 2002).
-Quick Tips: How-To Advice for Solos and Small Firms Managing Partners, Experienced Lawyers and Young Lawyers, 28 Law Prac. Mgmt. 50 (January-February 2002).
-Bennett, Joel, Truly Solo: How to Run a Successful Practice Without Employees, 19 GP Solo, 38 (January -February 2002).
-Cahill, Stephanie, Motion Warriors, 88 A.B.A.J. 28 (2002).
-Davis, Jenny, Power Up Your Practice, 88 A.B.A.J. 62 (2002).
-Hurley, Christopher, Thinking of Going Out On Your Own? Tips for Starting Your Own Firm and Running it as Efficiently as a Large Firm, 4 Lawyers Competitive Edge: The Journal of Law Office Economics and Management 1 (March 2002).
-Leckrone, Laura, Solo But Not Alone: One Solo-Practitioner's Story of How He Grew and Leveraged His Law Practice, 4 Lawyer's Competitive Edge: The Journal of Law Office Economics and Management, 1 (September 2002).
-Leffler, David, In the Beginning ...(Starting out in solo practice), 19 GP Solo, 54 (October-November 2002).
-Stansky, Lisa, Hustle, Networking and Business Sense Are the Ingredients for Practicing Solo, 30 Student Law. 6 (May 2002).
-Johnson, Knut, On Your Own - Solo and Small Firm Practices, 15 Crim Justice 36 (Winter 2001).
-Wheeler, John, Fifteen Tips for Tiny Savings that Add Up to a Tall Total, 5 Lawyer's Competitive Edge: The Journal of Law Office Economics and Management 13 (March 2001).
-Aronfield, Spencer, Go Solo Without Starving, 36 Trial 52 (February 2000).
-Gordon, Robert, Trial Research in the Age of Technology, 36 Trial 64 (June 2000).
-Laney, Mark, Tips On Law Office Management, 36 Trial 91 (February 2000).
-Rosenblum, Judith, et al, Toppling the Giants: Can Solo Lawyers Use Technology to Compete with Larger Firms and Win?, 26 Law Prac. Mgmt. 34 (January-February 2000).
-Pilldersdorf, Gary, Money Matters in Case Selection, 34 Trial 30 (January 1998).
-Lau, Edward, Taking Control of Your Practice, 34 Trial 41 ( January 1998).
-Kelly, Dulin, et al, Creating a Supportive Law Office Family: By playing fair and showing appreciation, you can keep your support staff happy and productive, 34 Trial 44 (January 1998).
-Piersall, Joanne, To Move or Not to Move, 34 Trial 57 (January 1998).
-Chanen, Jill, The Changing Face of Gay Legal Issues, 90 A.B.A.J. 47 (July 2004). (Re: Counseling the HIV Positive Client)
-Ethics Symposium: What Do Clients Want ?, 52 Emory L. J. (May 2003).
-Eades, Diana, "I don't think the lawyers were communicating with me." : Misunderstanding Cultural Differences in Communicative Style, 52 Emory L. J. 1109 (2003).
-Hall, John, 15 Red Flags for Identifying the Potentially Difficult Client, The Champion 31 (July 2003)
-McShane, John, The Need for Healing, 89 A.B.A.J. 59 (May 2003).
-Bergden, Astrid, Dealing with the Resistant Criminal Client: A Psychologically Minded Strategy for More Effective Legal Counseling, 38 Crim. L. Bull. 225 (2002).
-Chanen, Jill, At First Sight, 88 A.B.A.J. 53 (May 2002).
-Keeva, Steven, Culture of Professionalism, 87 A.B.A.J. 50 (November 2001).
-Keeva, Steven, What Clients Want, 87 A.B.A.J. 48 (June 2001).
-Keeva, Steven, Passionate Practitioner, 86 A.B.A.J. 56 (June 2000).
-O'Leary, Kimberly, When Context Matters: How to Choose an Appropriate Client Counseling Model, 4 Thomas M. Cooley J. Prac. & Clin. Law 103 (June 2001).
-Ellmann, Stephen, Truth and Consequences, 69 Fordham L. Rev. 895 (2000).
-Rawdon, Richard, Listening: The Art of Advocacy, 36 Trial 99 (January 2000).
-Egan, Dennis, Finding Diamonds in the Rough, 36 Trial 37 (December 2000).
-Maddock, Charles, Can We Talk? The Art of the Client Interview, 2 Lawyer's Competitive Edge: The Journal of Law Office Economics and Management 1 (July 2000).
-Keeva, Steven, Beyond the Words: Understanding What Your Client Is Really Saying Makes for Successful Lawyering , 85 A.B.A.J. 60 (1999).
-Lidman, Raven, The Power of Narrative: Listening to the Initial Client Interview, 22 Seattle U. L. Rev. 17 (1998).
-Robinson, Mary, Putting Clients to theTest: Careful Screening Can Minimize Malpractice Risks, 84 A.B.A.J.80 (November 1998).
-Custer, Andy, et al, Handling the Initial Client Interview, 21 Trial Lawyer, No. 4 , 207 (1998).
-Wolfram, Charles, Selecting Clients: Are You Free to Choose?, 34 Trial 21 (January 1998).
-Chanen, Jill, Reality Checks: Lawyers Must Manage Client Expectations By Being Upfront About What Is Possible and What Is Not, 83 A.B.A.J. 60 (November 1997).
-Abbott, Clay, et al, The Anatomy of a Client Interview, 42 Prac. Law. 61 ( December 1996).
-Earl, Allen, Conducting the Initial Interview: Rules and Red Flags, 29 Trial 58 (April 1993).
-Fried, Charles, The Lawyer as Friend: The Moral Foundations of the Lawyer-Client Relations, 85 Yale L.J. 1060 (1976).
-Gershman, Bennett, Litigating Brady v. Maryland: Games Prosecutors Play, 57 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 531 (2007).
-Mesereau Jr., Thomas, Random Thoufghts on Trial Practice, 31 Am. J. Trial Advoc. 115 (Summer 2007).
-Deal, Christopher, Brady Materiality Before Trial: The Scope of the Duty to Disclose and the Right to a Trial by Jury, 82 N.Y.U.L. Rev. 1780 (2007).
-Lewis, Elaine, Common Witness Misperceptions, 31 Litigation, No. 2, 25 (Winter 2005).
-Allen, John, Emerging from the Horse Shed and Still Passing the Smell Test - Ethics of Witness Preparation and Testimony, 32 Brief 56 (2003).
-Bocchino, Anthony, What Juries Want to Hear: Reverse Engineering the Verdict, 74 Temp. L. Rev. 177 (2001).
Bailey, William, Tie Your Case Together with a Good Theme, 37 Trial 58 (Feb. 2001).
-Orbals, Gerald, et al, Preparing for Spontaneity at Trial, 27 Litigation, No. 1, 125 (Fall 2001).
-Bocchino, Anthony, What Jurors Want to Hear: Methods for Developing Persuasive Case Theory, 67 Tenn. L. Rev. 543 (2000).
-Cohen, Jay, Powerful Witness Preparation, 27 Litigation, No. 1, 11 (Fall 2000).
-McElhaney, James, Persuasive Organization, 26 Litigation , No 1, 51 (Spring 2000).
-Zacharias, Fred, et al, Coaching Witnesses, 87 Ky. L.J. 1001 (1999).
-Schum, David, Marshaling Thoughts and Evidence During Fact Investigation, 40 South Texas Law Review 401 (1999).
-Hodes, William, The Professional Duty to Horseshed Witnesses Zealously - Within the Bounds of the Law, 30 Tex. Tech. L. Rev. 1343 (1999).
-Silver, Charles, Preliminary Thoughts on the Economics of Witness Preparation, 30 Tex. Tech. L. Rev. 1383 (1999).
-Tillers, Peter, et al, A Theory of Preliminary Fact Investigation, 24 U.C. Davis Law Review 931 (1991).
-Applegate, John, Witness Preparation, 68 Tex. L. Rev. 277 (1989).
-Steiner, Margaret, Adequacy of Fact Investigation in Criminal Defense Lawyer's Trial Preparation, 1981 Arizona State Law Journal 523 (1981).
- Basic Guide to Preparing for Trial in Civil and Criminal Cases - (42 pages on the web)
-McElhaney, James, Trial Notebook: Get It Admitted Some Other Way, 27 Litigation, No. 3, 53. (Spring 2001).
-Zagel, James, What to Do When the Judge Makes a Mistake, 27 Litigation, No. 1, 3 (Fall 2000).
-Conti, John, Trial Objections, 14 Litigation, No.1, 16 (Fall 1987).
-Bare Bones Technigue for the Novice (1)
- Ream, Limited Voir Dire: Why It Fails to Detect Jury Bias, 23 Crim. Just. 22 (2009).
-Diamond, Shari, Beyond Fantasy and Nightmare: A Portrait of the Jury, 54 Buff. L. Rev. 717 (2006).
- Podlas, Kimberlianne, The CSI Effect: Exposing the Media Myth, 16 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 429 (2006).
-Shelton, Donald, Kim, Young & Barak, Gregg, A Study of Juror Expectations and Demands Concerning Scientific Evidence: Does the "CSI Effect" Exist?, 9 Vanderbilt J. of Ent. and Tech. Law 331 (2006).
-Tyler, Tom, Viewing CSI and the Threshold of Guilt:Managing Truth and Justice in Reality and Fiction, 115 Yale L. J. 1050 (2006).
-Kraft, Brian, The Exclusion of Felons from Jury Service, 53 Am. L. Rev. 65 (2003).
-Kirgis, Paul, The Problem of the Expert Juror, 75 Temp. L. Rev. 493 (2002).
-Gillespie, John, Fear of Commitment? In Standefer v. State the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Clarifies the Role of Commitment Questions in Jury Selection in Criminal Trials, 54 Baylor L. Rev. (2002).
-Blue, Lisa & Hirschhorn, Robert, Goals and Practical Tips for Voir Dire, 26 Am. J. Trial Advoc. 233 (2002).
-Kerper, J., The Art and Ethics of Jury Selection, 25 Am. J. Trial Advoc. 123 (2002).
-Monsen, Karen, Privacy for Prospective Jurors at What Price? Distinguishing Privacy Rights from Privacy Interests: Rethinking Procedures to Protect Privacy in Civil and Criminal Cases, 21 Rev. Litig. 285 (2002).
-Hamlin, Sonya, Who Are Today's Jurors and How Do You Reach Them?, 27 Litigation, No. 3, 9 (Spring 2001).
-Pizzi, William & Hoffman, Morris, Jury Selection Errors on Appeal, 38 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 1391 (2001).
-Yarborough, Stephanie, The Jury Consultant - Friend or Foe of Justice, 54 SMU Law Review 185 (2001).
-Picking a Jury: Who are you talking to? 67 Tenn. L. Rev. 517 (2000).
-Clinkscale, Brent, et al , Home Field Advantage: The Opening Statement That Closes, 27 Litigation 6 (Fall 2000).
-Singer, Amy, Ten Common Mistakes Attorneys Make with Jurors, 36 Trial 76 (Jan. 2000).
-Salyers, Lance, Invaluable Tool vs. Unfair Use of Private Information: Examining Prosecutor's Use of Jurors' Criminal History Records in Voir Dire, 56 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 1079 (1999).
-King, Nancy, The American Criminal Jury, 62 L. & Contemp. Probs. 41 (Spring 1999).
-Koski, Douglas, Sex Crime Jury Selection: A Social Scientific Analysis, 35 Crim. L. Bull. 42 (January -February 1999).
-Miller, Michael, The Psychology of Jury Persuasion, 22 Am. J. Trial Advoc. 549 (1999).
-Gallagher, Elizabeth, The Ethics of Jury Selection, 41 For the Defense 47 (July 1999).
-Childs, William, The Intersection of Peremptory Challenges, Challenges for Cause, and Harmless Error, 27 Am J. Crim. L. 49 (1999).
-McElhaney, James, Just Tell the Story, 85 ABA Journal 68 (October 1999).
-Smith, Abbe, "Nice Work If You Can Get It": "Ethical" Jury Selection in Criminal Cases, 67 Fordham L. Rev. 523 (November 1998).
-Leipold, Andrew, Constitutionalizing Jury Selection in Criminal Cases: A Critical Evaluation, 86 Georgetown L. J. 945 ( February 1998).
-Vesper, Thomas, Seinfeld Syndrome:The Indifference of Otherwise Nice Jurors, 34 Trial 39 (October 1998).
-McElhaney, James, Make Limited Time for Voir Dire Count, 84 ABA Journal 66 (December 1998).
-Lisnek, Paul, Stepping Inside the Courtroom and the Juror's Minds: Meaningful Jury Selection, 41 Trial Lawyer's Guide 252 (Fall 1997).
-Bates Jr., Douglas, Voir Dire Examination in Criminal Jury Trials: What Is the Proper Scope of Inquiry, 70 Fla. Bar J., No 1, page 64 (January 1996).
-Fletcher, George, Political Correctness in Jury Selection, 29 Suffolk Univ. L. Rev. 1 (Spring 1995).
-Butler, Paul, Racially Based Jury Nullification: Black Power in the Criminal Justice System, 105 Yale L. J. 677 (1995). (A black law professor urges race-based jury nullification.)
-Bowen, Anne, The Jury: The Criminal Justice System's Different Voice, 62 Univ. Cinn. L. Rev. 133 (Spring 1994).
-McKnight, Cynthia, Right to Jury Trial, 82 Geo. L. J. 1033 (1994).
-Walsh, Michael, Voir Dire Follies: Humor In the Court, 30 Trial 52 ( February 1994).
-Dees, Morris, The Death of Voir Dire, 20 Litig. 14 (1993).
-Stone, Charles, Voir Dire: Just When You Think You've Heard It All, 17 Nova L. Rev. 867
( Winter 1993).
-Broderick, Raymond, Why the Peremptory Challenge Should Be Abolished, 65 Temp. L. Rev. 369 (1992).
-Visher, Christy, Juror Decision Making: The Importance of Evidence, 11 Law and Hum. Behav.1 (1987).
-Lusk, Prosecutors Are Permitted to Display Admissible Weapons to Juries During Opening Statements in Pennsylvania: Commonwealth v. Parker, 46 Duq. L. Rev. 679 (2008).
- Melilli, Kenneth, Succeeding in Opening Statement, 29 Am. J. Trial Advoc. 525 (2006).
- Macpherson, Susan & Rose, Jeremy, Five Steps to Persuasion in Opening Statement, 42 Trial 32 (April 2006).
- Shea, John, A Practical Guide to Persuasive Opening Statements, 17 Va. Trial Law. Assn. J. 10 (Spring 2005).
-Gianna, D. & Julien, A., Opening Statements 2d: Winning in the Beginning by Winning the Beginning Thomson West (2004) [This book willl cost you a bundle; in my opinion it's a so-so effort.]
-Tanford, Alexander, Objections During Opening Statement, 1 Indiana Civ. Lit. Rev. 221 (2004).
-Miller, Phillip, Storytelling: A Technique for Juror Persuasion, 26 Am. J. Trial Advoc. 489 (2003).
-Spiecker, Shelley & Worthington, Debra, The Influence of Opening Statement/Closing Argument Organizational Strategy On Juror Verdict and Damage Awards, 27 Law & Hum. Behav. 437 (2003).
-Cunningham, Robert, Opening Statements: Laying a Foundation, 37 Trial 66 ( February 2002).
-Carlson, Ronald, Opening Statement: Making It Stick, 9 Georgia Bar Journal 18 (August 2002). Weinberg, Shelley, Painting a Picture for the Jury: A Juror's Perspective, 90 Ill.B. J. 427 (2002).
-Powell, Gerald, Opening Statements: The Art of Storytelling (Trial Advocacy Symposium) 31 Stetson L. Rev. 89 (2001).
-Goldsmith, Fredrick, Preparing and Delivering an Effective Opening Statement, 43 For the Defense 47 (March 2001).
-Clinkscale, Brent, et al, Homefield Advantage: The Opening Statement that Closes, 27 Litigation, No. 1, 6 (Fall 2000).
-Lewis , Harvey, Opening Statements: One Trial Lawyer's Perspective (Anatomy of a Trial), 48 La. B. J. 93 (August 2000).
-Zwier, Paul & Galligan, Thomas, Technology and Opening Statements: A Bridge to the Virtual Trial of the Twenty-First Century, (Communicating with Juries) 67 Tenn. L. Rev. 523 (2000).
-McElhaney, James, Challenge Your Own Case: Ask the Questions the Jury Is Likely to Want Answered, 86 ABA Journal (September. 2000).
-Christie, Carrie, Build A Solid Opening Statement and Closing Argument: Beginning and Ending, 5 Ga. B.J. 9 (October 1999). -Opening Statements: Lasting Impressions, 35 Trial 62 (June 1999).
-Allison, Will, Tell Your Story Through Opening Statement, 34 Trial 78 (September 1998).
-Blackwell, Douglas, Opening Statements: Putting the Puzzle Pieces Before the Jury, 2 Tenn. J. Prac. & Procedure 27 (1998).
-Reid, Benjamin, The Trial Lawyer as a Storyteller: Reviving an Ancient Art, 24 Litigation, No. 3, 8 (Spring 1998).
-Opening Statements: Setting the Stage for Victory, 34 Trial 66 (March 1998).
-Dilworth, Donald, Waking Up Jurors, Shaking Up Courts, 33 Trial 20 (July 1997).
-Holmes, Brent, Opening Statements:A Plaintiff's Lawyer's Guide, 1 Trial Lawyers Guide 406 (1997).
-Perdue, Jim, Opening Statements: Good Beginnings, 32 Trial 44 (March 1996).
-Ahlen, Michael, Opening Statements in Jury Trials; What Are The Legal Limits? 71 N. D. L. Rev. 701 (1995).
-Bailey, William, The Artful Lawyer: More Show, Less Tell In Opening Statement (Trial Techniques) 29 Trial 28 ( October 1993).
-Lubet, Steven, The Opening Moment, 34 S. Tex. L. Rev. 109 (1993).
-French, Thomas, KISS In the Courtroom: Keep It Short and Simple (Forensic Oratory Will Hold Juror's Attention When Kept As Simple As Possible), 28 Trial 130 (November 1992).
-Pennington, Nancy, et al, A Cogntive Theory of Juror Decision Making: The Story Model, 13 Cardozo L. Rev. 519 (1991).
-McElhaney, James, Goals in Opening Statements, 16 Litigation, No.2, 47 (Winter 1990).
-Klieman, K Rikki, Opening Statements: How to Deliver a Convincing Opening In a Criminal Defense Case, 23 Trial 40 (September 1987).
-Snedaker, Kathryn, Storytelling in Opening Statements: Framing the Argumentation of the Trial, 10 Am. J. Trial Advoc., No 1, 15 (Summer 1986).
-Ordover, Abraham, Persuasion and the Opening Statement, 12 Litigation, No. 2, 12 (Winter 1986).
-Fields, Samuel, Opening Statements, 6 Hamline L. Rev. 281 (1983).
- Conley, John, et al, The Power of Language: The Presentational Style in the Courtroom, 1978 Duke Law Journal 1375.
-Vesper, Thomas, Add Dynamics to Direct Examination, 39 Trial 46 (Sept. 2003).
-Anderson, Carol, The Gentle Art of Conversational English In Direct Examination, 25 Am. J. Trial Advoc. 157 (2002).
-Fine, Adam, A Different Approach to Direct Examination of Expert Witnesses, 13 Prac. Litigation 19 (2002).
-McElhaney, James, Simple Direct, 2 Litigation 63 ( Spring 2002).
-Caldwell, Mitchell, Primacy, Recency, Ethos, and Pathos: Integrating Principles of Communication Into the Direct Examination, 76 Notre Dame L. Rev. 423 (2001).
-Mirsky, Emily, Casenote, Evidence - Reevaluating Criminal Defense Trial Strategy: Why Defendants Need to Think Twice Before Introducing Prior Convictions On Direct Examination, 74 -Temple L. Rev. 231 (2001).
-Brush, Robert, Evidence - Preservation for Appeal - Objection to the Admissibility of Prior Conviction Evidence Is Waived When a Defendant Testifies to Such Evidence On Direct Examination, 31 Seton Hall L. Rev. 288 (2000).
-Miller, Henry, Direct Examination:Thirty One Pertinent Pointers, 29 Trial Law Q. 154 (1999).
-DaSilva, Willard, The Real Challenge of Direct Examination, 9 Prac. Litig. 35 ( July 1998).
-Kerper, Jan, The Art and Ethics of Direct Examination, 22 Am. J. Trial Advoc. 377 (1998).
-Turbak, Nancy, Effective Direct Examination, 34 Trial 68 (June 1998).
-Sarner, Richard, Direct Examination, 27 A. F. L. Rev. 77 (1987).
-Gaines, Phillip, Communicating with Juries: Epidsodic Representational Structure in Cross-Examination, 67 Tenn. L. Rev. 599 (2000).
-Gonzalez, Ervin, Preparing and Effective Cross-Examination of an Adverse Witness, 27 Litigation, No. 1, 19 (Fall 2000).
-Meyer, Stephen & Singleton, Norman, Rehabilitation of Witnesses:Looking Out My Back Door, 23 Am. J. Trial Advoc. 525 (2000).
Younger, Irving, Mastering the Art of Cross-Examination: Problems, NITA, (2000).
-McElhaney, James, Misdirect, Then Pounce: Don't Always Let Witnesses Know Where You Are Taking Them, 85 A.B.A.J. 78 (August 1999).
-Douglass, John, Beyond Admissibility: Real Confrontation, Virtual Cross-Examination, and the Right to Confront Hearsay, 67 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 191 (1999).
-Moss, Debra, Bias by Innuendo, 76 A.B.A.J. 19 (August 1990).
-Moritz, Stacey, et al, Cross-Examining the Accomplice Witness, 14 Litigation, No 1, 31 (Fall 1987).
- Halpern, Sue, Can't Remember What I Forgot; The Good News from the Front Lines of Memory Research, Harmony Books (2008).
-Thompson, Sandra, Beyond a Reasonable Doubt: Reconsidering Uncorroborated Eyewitness Identification Testimony, 41 U. C. Davis L. Rev. 1487 (2008).
- Radel, Robert, et al, Repressed Memory: Real or Fantasy?, 58 Fed'n Def. & Corp. Couns. Q. 481 (2008).
- Wise, Richard, et al, A Tripartite Solution to Eyewitness Error, 97 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 807 (2007).
-Cutting, Dionne, Why the Hesitation?: A Look at Why Police Departments, Prosecutors and Court Systems Have Not Done Their Part to Improve the Quality of Eyewitness Identification and Testimony, 50 How. L. J. 953 (2007).
-Simon, Larry, Admissibility of Expert-Witness Testimony Regarding the Reliability of Eyewitness Identification, 67 Bench and Bar, No. 6, 23 (2003).
-Natarajan, Radha, Racialized Memory and Reliability: Due Process Applied to Cross-Racial Eyewitness Identification, 78 N. Y. U. L. Rev. 182 (2003).
-Higgins, Edmund, et al, Establishing the Relevance of Expert Testimony Regarding Eyewitness Identification: Comparing Forty Recent Cases with the Psychological Studies, 30 Northern Kentucky L. Rev. 471 (2003).
-Koch, Rudolph, Process v. Outcome: The Proper Role of Corroborative Evidence in Due Process Analysis of Eyewitness Identification Testimony, 88 Cornell L. Rev. 1097 (2003).
-Collins, Winn, Improving Eyewitness Evidence Collection Procedures in Wisconsin, 2003 Wis. L. Rev. 529.
-Penrod, Steven, Eyewitness Identification Evidence: How Well Are Witnesses and Police Performing, 18 Criminal Justice 36 (2003).
-Yob, Dori, Mistaken Identifications Cause Wrongful Convictions: New Jersey's Lineup Guidelines Restore Hope, But Are They Enough?, 43 Santa Clara L. Rev. 213 (2002).
-Copeland, Jill, Helping Jurors Recognize the Frailties of Eyewitness Identification Evidence, 46 Criminal Law Quarterly 188 (July 2002).
-Sussman, Jake, Suspect Choices: Lineup Procedures and the Abdication of Judicial and Prosecutorial Responsibility for Improving the Criminal Justice System, 27 N. Y. U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 507 (2002).
-Behrman, Bruce, et al, Eyewitness Identification in Actual Criminal Cases: An Archival Analysis, 25 Law and Human Behavior 475 (2001). (pro-prosecution)
-Doyle, James, et al, The Eyes Have It - or Do They? New Guidelines for Better Eyewitness Procedures, 16 Criminal Justice, No. 3, 12 (Fall 2001).
-Dillickrath, Thomas, Expert Testimony on Eyewitness Identification: Admissibility and Alternatives, 55 U. Miami L. Rev. 1059 (2001).
-Silva, Ambrosio, Criminal Law - Suggestive Identification Does Not Violate Due Process If Otherwise Reliable, 34 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 673 (2001).
-Goodan, Gail, et al, Effects of Past Abuse Experiences On Children's Eyewitness Memory, 25 Law and Human Behavior 269 ( 2001).
-Garrioch, Lynn, et al, Lineup Administrator's Expectations: Their Impact On Eyewitness Confidence, 25 Law and Human Behavior 299 (2001).
-Rutledge, John, They All Look Alike: The Inaccuracy of Cross-Racial Identification, 28 Am. J. Crim. L. 207 (2001).
-Judges, Donald, Two Cheers for the Department of Justice's Eyewitness Evidence: A Guide for Law Enforcement, 53 Ark. L. Rev. 231 (2000).
-Brogdon, Innoculating Against Bad Facts: Brilliant Trial Strategy or Misguided Dogma?, 63 Tex. B. J. 443 (May 2000).
-Klonoff, Robert, et al, Innoculating Against Bad Facts, 63 Tex. B. J. 754 (Sept. 2000).
- Bibliography of Materials on Eyewitness Testimony and False Memory - A professor has created a list of almost everything published on the subject of eyewitness testimony and false memory; it contains no hyperlinks; so you will have to have access to a library that contains the hard copy of any resources listed.
-Symposium: Advocacy, 74 Temple L. Rev. (Spring 2000).
-Ross, Josephine, He Looks Guilty: Reforming Good Character Evidence to Undercut the Presumption of Guilt, 65 Univ. Pitt. L. Rev. 227 (2004).
-Horstein, Alan, On the Horns of An Evidentiary Dilemma: The Intersection of Federal Rules of Evidence 806 and 608(b), 56 Ark. L. Rev. 543 (2003).
-Zeigler, Donald, The Confusing Relationship Between Rules 608(b) and 609 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, 19 N. Y. L.Sch. J. Hum. Rts. 157 (2003).
-Gilligan, Francis, et al, Bringing the "Opening the Door" Theory to a Close: The Tendency to Overlook the Specific Contradiction Doctrine in Evidence Law, 41 Santa Clara L. Rev. 807 (2001).
-Sonenshein, David, Impeaching the Hearsay Declarant, 74 Temple L. Rev. 163 (2001).
-McMunigal, Kevin, Reforming Extrinsic Impeachment, 33 Conn. L. Rev. 363 (2001).
-Garrett, Misty, Defendants Waive Appellate Review By Reducing the Sting of Prior Conviction Impeachment Evidence, 52 Mercer L. Rev. 789 (2002).
Thomure, John, Kyles v. Whitley: An Opportunity Lost? An Examination of the Rule of Discovery Concerning the Disclosure of Impeachment Material Contained in Personnel Files of Testifying Government Agents in Federal Criminal Trials, 83 Marq. L. Rev. 547 (2000).
-Owens, John, Distinguishing Impeachment of Credibility from the Act of Burdening a Defendant's Constitutional Rights, 78 Denv. U. L. Rev. 173 (2000).
-McElhaney, James, It's Not Always Normandy: Advance Impeachment Planning Makes Your Attack Count, 86 A.B.A.J. 72 (March 2000).
-Imwinkelreid, Edward, A Radical Approach to the Law of Impeachment: The Statutory Outer Limits, 22 Am. J. Trial Advoc. 1 (1998).
-Moody, James, A Primer On Methods of Impeachment, 45 A. F. L. Rev. 161 (1998).
-H Farnham, David, Impeaching the Hearsay Declarant: Rule 806 Can Be A Trap for the Unwary Lawyer, 12 Criminal Justice 4 (1998).
-Dussalt, Susan, Cross-Examining and Impeaching Expert Psychiatric Witnesses, 26 Colo. Law. 75 (November 1997).
-Kerper, Jan, Killing Him Softly with His Words: The Art and Ethics of Impeachment with Prior Statements, 21 Am. J. Trial Advoc.81 (1997).
-Schlueter, David, Impeaching the Hearsay Declarant, 60 Tex. B. J. 76 (January 1997).
-Gair, Chris, Problem Witnesses; Coping with Character Attacks, 32 Trial, No. 9, 64 (September 1996).
-Martin, Earl, Prior Inconsistent Statements and the Military Rules of Evidence, 39 A.F. L. Rev. 207 (1996).
-Bennett, Fred, How to Administer the "Big Hurt" in a Criminal Case: The Life and Times of Federal Rule of Evidence, 806, 44 Cath. U. L. Rev. 1135 (1995).
-Cordray, Margaret, Evidence Rule 806 and the Problem of Impeaching the Non-testifying Declarant, 56 Ohio St. L. J. 495 (1995).
-McElhaney, James, The Varying Terrain of Impeachment: Make Each Attack Suitable to the Witness and the Situation, 80 A.B.A.J. 68 (July 1994).
-Schlueter, David, Impeaching the Character Witness, 57 Tex. B. J. 746 (July 1994).
-Grayer, Laurence, The Admissibility of Rehabilitative and Substantive Prior Consistent Statements and the Temporal Requirement, 9 St. John's J. Legal Comment. 243 (1993).
-Saltzburg, Stephen, Uncharged Acts: Substantive Versus Impeachment Use, 8 Criminal Justice, No. 1, 35 (Spring 1993).
-Selinger, Carl, The "Law" on Lawyer Efforts to Discredit Truthful Testimony, 46 Okla. L. Rev. 99 (1993).
-Uviller, Richard, Credence, Character, and the Rules of Evidence: Seeing Through the Liar's Tale, 42 Duke L. J. 776 (1993).
-Symposium, Expertise in the Courtroom: Scientists and Wizards, 52 Vill. L. Rev., No. 4, 679 (2007).
-Murphy, Erin, The New Forensics: Criminal Justice, False Certainty, and the Second Generation of Scientific Evidence, 95 Cal. L. Rev. 721 (2007).
-Giannelli, Paul, The Right to Defense Experts, 18 Criminal Justice, No. 2, 14 (Summer 2003).
-McElhaney, James, Terms of Enlightenment: Articulate Expert Witnesses Help Jurors Visualize Facts, 88 A.B.A.J. 82 (1997).
-Lubet, Steven, Expert Testimony, 17 Am. J. Trial Advoc. 399 (1994).
-Wawro, Mark, Effective Presentation of Experts, 19 Litigation 31 (1993).
Forensic Psychiatry /Psychology
-Davoli, Joanmarie, Psychiatric Evidence On Trial, 56 SMU. L. Rev. 2191 (2003).
-Tanford, Alexander, et al, Better Trials Through Science: A Defense of Psychologist-Lawyer Collaboration, 66 N. C. L. Rev. 741 (1988).
Fingerprints
- Wertheim, Latent Fingerprint Evidence: Fabrication, Not Error, 32 Champion, No. 9, 16 (2009).
-Benedict, Nathan, Fingerprints and the Daubert Standard for Admission of Scientific Evidence: Why Fingerprints Fail and a Proposed Remedy, 46 Ariz. L. Rev. 519 (2004).
-Saks, Michael, The Legal and Scientific Evaluation of Forensic Science (Especially Fingerprints), 33 Seton Hall L. Rev. 1167 (2003).
-Moenssens, Andre, Fingerprint Identification: A Valid, Reliable "Forensic Science", 18 Criminal Justice, No. 2, 30 (2003).
-Mears, Michael, et al, The Challenge of Fingerprint Comparison Opinion in the Defense of a Criminally Charged Client, 19 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 705 (2003).
-Giannelli, Paul, et al, Forensic Science: Fingerprints, 38 Criminal Law Bulletin, No. 5, 642 (2002).
-Sombat, Jessica, Latent Justice: Daubert's Impact on the Evaluation of Fingerprint Identification Testimony, 70 Fordam L. Rev. 2819 (2002).
-Epstein, Robert, Fingerprints Meet Daubert: The Myth of Fingerprint "Science" Is Revealed, 75 S. Cal. L. Rev. 605 (2002).
-Mnookin, Jennifer, Fingerprint Evidence in An Age of DNA Profiling, 67 Brook. L. Rev. 13 (2001).
Firearms Identification
- For information regarding particular firearms, consult the most recent yearly editions of the Gun Digest and the Gun Trader's Guide, either or both of which may be purchased on Amazon.com.
- Schwartz, Challenging Firearms and Toolmark Identification - Part Two, 32 Champion, No. 9, 44 (2009).
-Kaasa, Suzanne, Peterson, Tiamayo, Morris, Erin & Thompson, William, Statistical Inference and Forensic Evidence: Evaluating a Bullet Lead Match, 31 Law & Hum. Behav. 433 (2007).
-Steele, Lisa, All we want you to do is confirm what we already know." A Daubert Challenge to Firearms Identification, 38 Criminal Law Bulletin 466 (2002).
-Inbau, Fred, Firearms Identification - "Ballistics", 89 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 1293 (1999).
-Giannelli, Ballistics Evidence: Firearms Identification, 27 Criminal Law Bulletin 195 (1991).
Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus
- 128 page pdf paper from NDAA-APRI
Handwriting
-Risinger, Michael & Saks, Michael, Brave New "Post-Daubert World" - A Reply to Professor Moenssens, 29 Seton Hall L. Rev. 405 (1998).
-Moenssens, Andre, Handwriting Identification Evidence In the Post-Daubert World: Identifying the Genuine Article and the Genuine Legal Issue:Broader Standards Needed for "Scientific Knowledge," 66 U. M. K. C. L. Rev. 251 (1997).
-Risinger, Michael & Saks, Michael, Science and Nonscience in the Courts: Daubert Meets Handwriting Deification Expertise, 82 Iowa L. Rev. 21 1996).
-Risinger, Michael, Denbeaux, Mark & Saks, Michael, Exorcisms of Ignorance as a Proxy for Rational Knowledge: The Lessons of Handwriting Identification Expertise, 37 U. Pa. L. Rev. 731 (1989).
DNA Evidence
-Best DNA Index on the Internet (Denver DA's Office)
- Bibliography of resources including popular media, journals and books
- Saks, Michael & Koehler, Jonathan, The Individualization Fallacy, 61 Vand. L. Rev. 199 (2008).
- Lynch, Michael, Expertise in Action: Presenting and Attacking Expert Evidence in DNA "Fingerprinting" Cases, 52 Vill. L. Rev. 925 (2007).
-Epstein, Edna, Is the DNA Fingerprint an Infallible Piece of Evidence?, 31 Litigation, No. 1, 25 (Fall 2004).
-Kaye, H, DNA Identification Databases Legality, Legitimacy, and Population-Wide Coverage, 2003 Wis. L. Rev. 413.
-Herlica, Debra, DNA Databanks: When Has A Good Thing Gone Too Far?, 52 Syracuse L. Rev. 951 (2002).
-Mellon, Jennifer, Manufacturing Convictions: Why Defendants Are Entitled to the Data Underlying Forensic DNA Kits, 51 Duke L. J. 1097 (2001).
-Koehler, Jonathan, When Are People Persuaded by DNA Match Statistics, 25 Law and Human Behavior 493 (2001).
-Kaye, D.H., Two Fallacies About DNA Data Banks for Law Enforcement, 67 Brook. L. Rev. 179 (2001).
-O'Reilly, Gregory, et al, Forensic DNA Case Evaluation and Litigation, 28 Litigation, No. 1, 43 (2001).
-Jewkes, Michael, Just Scratching the Surface: DNA Sampling Prior to Arrest and the Fourth Amendment, 35 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 125 (2001).
-Donnelly, Peter & Friedman, Richard, DNA Database Searches and the Legal Consumption of Scientific Evidence, 97 Mich. L. Rev. 931 (1999).
-DeSario, Merging Technology with Justice: How Electronic Courtrooms Shape Evidentiary Concerns, 50 Clev. St. L. Rev. 57 (2002-03).
-Babcock, et al, Getting Your Message Across: Visual Aids and Demonstrative Exhibits in the Courtroom, 27 Litigation, No. 3, 41 (2001).
-McElhaney, James, Show Time: Don't Get Carried Away with Complicated Exhibits, 87 A.B.A.J. 64 (August 2001).
-Cooper, Mary, The Use of Demonstrative Exhibits at Trial, 34 Tulsa L. J. 567 (1999).
-McElhaney, James, Using the Exhibit: Simplicity and Timing Can Maximize Effectiveness, 80 A.B.A.J. 60 (June 1994).
For more reading re argument, refer to the Bibliography page of the Jury Argument in Criminal Cases web site.
Persuasive Advocacy
-Clark, Sherman, The Character of Persuasion, 1 Ave Maria L. Rev. 61 (2003).
-Munsinger, Kim, Seven Psychological Principles You Can Use to Make Your Case, 29 Law Practice Management, No. 4, 36 (May-2003).
-Miller, Phillip, Storytelling: A Technique for Juror Persuasion, 26 Am. J. Trial Advoc. 489 (Spring 2003).
-Sherman, Rob, Polishing Your Presentations: 10 Rules, 29 Law Practice Management , No. 4, 34 (May 2003).
-Mandell, Mark, Persuasion, 31 Trial Lawyer's Quarterly, No. 2, 32 (Summer 2001).
-Baird, Peter, Persuasion 101, 27 Litigation, No. 4, 25 (Summer 2001).
-Caughfield, Lance, Credibility, 27 Litigation, No. 4, 27 (Summer 2001).
-Haan, Sarah, The "Persuasion Route" of the Law: Advertising and Legal Persuasion, 100 Colum. L. Rev. 1281 (2000).
-Kadoch, Laurie, Seduced by Narrative: Persuasion in the Courtroom, 49 Drake L. Rev. 71 (2000).
-Tanford, James, Everything You Wanted to Know About Trial Procedure and Tactics (date unknown). (Kudos to a law professor who makes useful material available for free on the Internet.)
-Ewen, Stuart, Reflections On Visual Persuasion, 43 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 811 (1999).
-Ramsey, Gail, Communication Theories On Trial: Can the scales of justice be swayed by the application of communication theories?, 21 Communications and the Law, No. 1, 31 (March 1999).
-Bartimus, James, In the Mind of the Jury: The Psychologies of Persuasion and their Use in the Modern Courtroom, 22 Trial Lawyer, No. 1, 17 (January 1999).
-Clark, Sherman, Literate Lawyering: An Essay on Imagination and Persuasion, 30 Rutgers L. J. 575 (Spring 1999).
-Wangerin, Paul, A Multidisciplinary Analysis of the Structure of Persuasive Arguments, 16 Harv. J. L. & Pub. Pol'y 195 (1993).
-Strausss, David, Persuasion, Autonomy and Freedom of Expression, 91 Colum. L. Rev. 334 (March 1991).
-Rench, Stephen, Building the Powerfully Persuasive Criminal Defense, 42 Mercer L. Rev. 569 (1991).
-Stuckey, Roy, Persuasion from A to P: Back to the Basics, 30 Santa Clara L. Rev. 677 (1990).
-King, Kermit, Verbal Persuasion: What You Need to Know, 24 Trial, No 8, 71 (August 1988).
-McElhaney, James, All About Litigation, 12 Litigation, No. 2, 2 (Winter 1986).
-Rothblatt, Henry, Psychological Techniques of Persuasion in the Trial Process, 11 Ohio N. U. L. Rev. 755 (1984).
-Symposium, Ethics and Evidence, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 1225 (2007). (This is a splendid stuff for criminal lawyers.)
-Symposium, Modern Methods in Legal Ethics: Theoretical and Practical Approaches, 39 Idaho L. Rev. (Spring 2003).
-Symposium, Ethics in Criminal Advocacy, 68 Fordham L. Rev. (April 2000).
-Symposium, Responsibilities of a Criminal Defense Lawyer, 30 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. (1996).
- Gershman, Bennett, The Most Dangerous Power of the Prosecution, 29 Pace L. Rev. 1 (2009).
- King, John, Candor, Zeal, and the Substitution of Judgment: Ethics and the Mentally Ill Criminal Defendant, 58 Amer. U. L. Rev. 207 (2008).
- Bennardo, Kevin, A Defense Bar: The "Proof of Innocence"Requirement in Criminal Malpractice Claims, 5 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 341 (2007)
-Green, Bruce, Criminal Defense Lawyering at the Edge: A Look Back, 36 Hofstra L. Rev. 353 (2007).
-Gillers, Stephen, Monroe Freedman's Solution to the Criminal Defense Lawyer's Trilemma Is Wrong as a Matter of Policy and Constitutional Law, 34 Hofstra L. Rev. 821 (2006). (See Freedman, Disclosing the Truth About Client Perjury)
-Gross, Leonard, Are Differences Among the Attorney Conflict of Interest Rules Consistent with Principles of Behavioral Economics?, 19 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 111 (2006).
-Schwan, Christopher, Right Up to the Line: The Ethics of Advancing Nullification Arguments to the Jury, 29 J. Leg. Prof. 293 (2005).
-Aprile II, Vincent, Client Perjury: When Do You Know the Client Is Lying?, 19 Crim Just. 14 (2004).
-Glassman, Jeffrey, Mickens v. Taylor: The Court's New Don't Ask, Don't Tell Policy for Attorneys Faced with a Conflict of Interest, 18 St. John's J. Legal Comment 919 (2004).
-Duncan, Meredith, Criminal Malpractice: A Lawyer's Holiday, 37 Ga. Law Rev. 1251 (2003).
-Barker, Jonathan, et al, Who's In Charge Here? The Ethics 2000 Approach to Resolving Lawyer-Client Conflicts, 16 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 50 (Summer 2003).
-Freeman, Carol, Retaining Records: What and for How Long, 17 Criminal Justice , No. 4, 16 (Winter 2003).
-Smith, Abbe, The Difference in Criminal Defense and the Difference It Makes, 11 Wash. U. J. Law & Policy 83 (Winter 2003).
-Joy, Peter, The Alternative Perpetrator Strategy, 17 Criminal Justice, No. 4, 32 (Winter 2003).
-Barr, Ross, Joint Representation of Criminal Codefendants: A Proposal to Breathe Life Into Section 4.3.5. (c) of the A.B.A. Standards Relating to the Administration of Criminal Justice, 15 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 635 (2002).
-Curtis, Dennis, Grieving Criminal Defense Lawyers, 70 Fordham L. Rev. 1615 (2002).
-Duncan, Meredith, The (So Called) Liability of Criminal Defense Attorneys: A System in Need of Reform, 2003 BYU L. Rev. 1 (2002)
-Hill, Louise, Change Is In the Air: Lawyer Advertising and the Internet, 36 U. Rich. L. Rev. 21 (2002).
-Green, Bruce, Regulating Federal Prosecutor's Ethics, 55 Vand. L. Rev. 381 (2002).
-Gershman, Bennett, Witness Coaching By Prosecutors, 23 Cardozo L. Rev. 829 (2002).
-Joy, Peter, Witness Preparation: When Does It Cross the Line?, 17 Criminal Justice 48 (Fall 2002).
-Joy, Peter, et al, Anti-Contact Rule in Criminal Investigations, 16 Criminal Justice 44 ( Winter 2002).
-Knothe, Paul, Walking the Tightrope Between Advising and Assisting Clients With Criminal or Fraudulent Conduct: Can the A.B.A. Provide Better Guidance?, 15 Geo. J. Leg. Ethics 809 (2002).
-Podger, James, et al, Lawyer Ethics in a State of Flux, 88 A.B.A.J. 46 (2002).
-Rhode, Deborah, Balanced Lives for Lawyers, 70 Fordham L. Rev. 2207 (2002).
-Ross, Michael, Thinking Outside the Box: How the Enforcement of Ethical Rules Can Minimize the Dangers of Prosecutorial Leniency and Immunity Deals, 23 Cardozo L. Rev. 875 (2002).
-Slipakoff, Brian, et al, The Criminal Defense Attorney Facing Prospective Client Perjury, 15 Geo. J. Leg. Ethics 935 (2002).
-Southwick, Ardor and Advocacy:Attorney-Client Sexual Relations and the Regulatory Impulse in Texas and Across the Nation, 44 S. Tex. L. Rev. 307 (2002).
-Stein, Jacob, Blackmail, Extortion, and Other Highly Questionable Tactics, 28 Criminal Justice 48 (Winter 2002).
-Tanford, Alexander, The Ethics of Evidence, 25 Am. J. Trial Advoc. 487 (2002).
-Warren, Maria, Ethical Prosecution: A Philosophical Field Guide, 41 Washburn L. J. 269 (2002).
-Wilkinson, Edward, Conflicts of Interest in Texas Criminal Cases, 54 Baylor L. Rev. 171 (2002).
-Woessner, Heidi, Criminal Law - the Crucible of Adversarial Testing: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Unauthorized Concessions of Client's Guilt, 24 W. New Eng. L. Rev. 315 (2002).
-Wolfram, Charles, Ethics 2000 and Conflicts of Interest: The More Things Change, 70 Tenn. L. Rev. 27 (2002).
-Montz, Craig, Why Lawyers Continue to Cross the Line in Closing Arguments: An Examination of Federal and State Cases, 28 Ohio N. U. L. Rev. 67 (2001).
-Miller, Jeremy, Client Perjury: An Ever Present, Multidimensional Problem, 106 Com. L.J. 349 (2001).
-Saks, Michael, Scientific Evidence and the Ethical Obligations of Attorneys, 49 Cle. St. L. Rev. 421 (2001).
-DeVaney, Brenna, The "No Contact" Rule: Helping or Hurting Criminal Defendants in Plea Negotiations, 14 Geo. J. Leg. Ethics 933 (2001).
-Griffin, Leslie, The Prudent Prosecutor, 14 Geo. J. Leg. Ethics 259 (2001).
-McFaden, Casey, Prosecutorial Misconduct, 14 Geo. J. Leg. Ethics 1211 (2001).
-Scheff, Richard, Getting Witnesses to Talk, 27 Litigation 38, (Summer 2001).
-Godfrey, Lindsey, Rethinking the Ethical Ban On Criminal Contingent Fees: A Common Sense Approach to Asset Forfeiture, 79 Tex. L. Rev. 1699 (2001).
-Gershman, Bennett, The Prosecutor's Duty of Truth, 14 Geo. J. Leg. Ethics 309 (2001).
-Boyd, Dan, Current Trends in Conflict of Interest, 53 Baylor L. Rev. 1 (2001).
-Liotti, Thomas, et al, The Uneven Playing Field: Ethical Disparities Between Prosecution and Defense Functions in Criminal Cases, 17 Touro L. Rev. 467 (2001).
-Harris, George, Testimony for Sale: The Law and Ethics of Snitches and Experts, 28 Pepp. L. Rev. 1 (2001).
-Smith, Abbe, Can You Be a Good Person and a Good Prosecutor? 14 Geo. J. Leg. Ethics 355 (2001).
-Madden, Mario, The Indiscreet Role of Lawyer Discretion in Confidentiality Rules, 14 Geo. J. Leg. Ethics 603 (2001).
-Rolfes, Peter, Another Misunderstood Relation: Confidentiality and the Duty to Report, 14 Geo. J. Leg. Ethics 62 (2001).
-Simon, William, Thinking Like a Lawyer - About Ethics, 38 Duq. L. Rev. 1015 (2000).
-Elkins, James, Lawyer Ethics: A Pedagogical Mosaic, 14 Notre Dame J. L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y 117 (2001).
-Galin, Ross, Above the Law: The Prosecutor's Duty to Seek Justice and the Performance of Substantial Assistance Agreements, 68 Fordham L. Rev. 1245 (2000).
-Mensoian, Christopher, Bates, the Model Rules and Attorney Advertising, 32 McGeorge L.Rev. 77 (2000).
-Uviller, Richard, The Neutral Prosecutor: The Obligation of Dispassion in a Passionate Pursuit, 68 Fordham L. Rev. 1695 (2000).
-Aaron, David, Ethics, Law Enforcement, and Fair Dealing: A Prosecutor's Duty to Disclose Nonevidentiary Information, 67 Fordham L. Rev. 3005 (1999).
-Frey, Christopher, The State v. The Self-Represented: A Florida Prosecutor's Concerns When Litigating Against a Pro Se Defendant in a Criminal Trial, 29 Stetson L. Rev. 181 (1999).
-Perkins, Kyle, Attorney Advertising: The Marketing of Legal Services in the Twenty-First Century, 35 Gonz. L. Rev. 99 (1999).
-Guttila, Carolyn, Caught Between a Rock and a Hard Place: When Can or Should an Attorney Disclose A Client's Confidence, 32 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 707 (1999).
-Luban, David, Contrived Ignorance, 87 Geo. L. J. 957 (1999).
-Schlitz, Patrick, Choices Facing Young Lawyers: On Being a Happy. Healthy, and Ethical Member of an Unhappy, Unhealthy, and Unethical Profession, 52 Vand. L. Rev. 871 (1999).
Zacharias, Fred, et al, Coaching Witnesses, 87 Ky. L. J. 1001 (1999).
-Easton, Stephen, The Truth About Ethics and Ethics About Truth: An Open Letter to Trial Attorneys, 33 Gonz. L. Rev. 463 (1998).
-Hellwege, Jean, No Comment: Professors, Legal Groups Consider Ethical Codes for Legal Commentators, 34 Trial 16 (July 1998).
-Levin, Leslie, The Emperor's Clothes and Other Tales About the Standards for Imposing Lawyer Discipline Sanctions, 48 Am. L. Rev. 1 (1998).
-McSorley, Joseph, "Criminal Lawyers" or "Lawyer Criminals"? Ethics of Criminal Bar Under Attack, 72 Fla. B. J. 35 (February 1998).
-Sarat, Austin, Enactments of Professionalism: A Study of Judges' and Lawyers' Accounts of Ethics and Civility in Litigation, 67 Fordham L. Rev. 809 (1998).
-Segal, David, My Reputation or Your Liberty (Or Your Life): The Ethical Obligation of Criminal Defense Lawyers in Postconviction Proceedings, 23 J. Legal Prof. 85 (1998-99).
- Zacharias, Fred, Waiving Conflicts of Interest, 108 Yale L. J. 407 (1998).
-Hazard Jr., Geoffrey, The Client Fraud Problem as a Justinian Quartet: An Extended Analysis, 25 Hofstra L. Rev. 1041 (1997).
-Cachris, Plato, Responsibilities of a Criminal Defense Attorney, 30 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 33 (1996). [Note: The same issue has four other articles on the same subject by Gerald Lefcourt, Brian O'Neill, Greta van Sutern, and Dan Webb respectively.]
-Cusimano, Gregory, Becoming the Best We Can Be, 32 Trial , No. 9 , 80 (September 1996).
-Greenberg, Mel, Beyond Confrontation: A Holistic Approach to the Practice of Law, 30 New Eng. L. Rev. 927 (1996).
-Bresler, Kenneth, "I never lost a trial": When Prosecutors Keep Score of Criminal Convictions, 9 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 537 (1996).
-Frankel, Marvin, Clients' Perjury and Lawyers' Options, 1 J. Inst. for Study Legal Ethics 25 (1996).
-Hall Jr., John Wesley, Professional Responsibility of the Criminal Lawyer, West Publishing (2nd ed. 1996).
-White, Roderick, Constitutional Ethics: Lawyer Solicitation of Clients, 22 S. U. L. Rev. 275 (1995).
-Wydick, Richard, The Ethics of Witness Coaching, 17 Cardozo L. Rev. 1 (1995).
-Marella, Vincent, End the War Between Prosecution and Defense, 10 Criminal Justice, No. 2., 34 (Summer 1995).
-French, Tom, Ethics and Persuasion: Right Makes Might in the Courtroom, 31 Criminal Justice, No. 4, 86 ( April 1995).
Horgan, Robert, Making Black out of Gray: An Attorney's Duty to Investigate Suspected Client Fraud, 29 New Eng. L. Rev. 795 (1995).
-Liskov, Donald, Criminal Defendant Perjury: A Lawyer's Choice Between Ethics, the Constitution, and the Truth, 28 New Eng. L. Rev. 881 (1994).
-Silver, Jay, Truth, Justice and the American Way: The Case Against the Client Perjury Rules, 47 Vand. L. Rev. 339 (1994).
-Simon, William, The Ethics of Criminal Defense, 91 Mich. L. Rev. 1703 (1993).
-Rutherglen, George, Dilemmas and Disclosures: A Comment on Client Perjury, 19 Am. J. Crim. L. 267 (1992).
-Shafer, Thomas, Lawyer Professionalism as a Moral Argument, 26 Gonz. L. Rev. 393 (1991).
-Kanner, Gideon, Welcome Home Rambo: High-Minded Ethics and Low-Down Tactics in the Courts, 25 Loyola L. A. L. Rev. 81 (1991).
-Hall, John, Handling Client Perjury After Nix. v. Whiteside: A Criminal Defense Lawyer's View, 42 Mercer L. Rev. 769 (1991).
-Green, Bruce, Her Brother's Keeper: The Prosecutor's Responsibility When Defense Counsel Has a Potential Conflict of Interest, 16 Am. J. Crim. L. 323 (1989).
-Freedman, Monroe, Client Confidences and Client Perjury - Some Unanswered Questions, 136 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1939 (1988).
-Lefstein, Norman, Client Perjury in Criminal Cases: Still in Search of an Answer, 1 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 521 (1988).
-Piorkowski Jr., Joseph, Professional Conduct and the Preparation of Witnesses for Trial: Defining Acceptable Limitations of "Coaching," 1 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 389 (1987).
-Subin, Harry, The Criminal Lawyers "Different Mission": Reflections on the "Right" to Present a False Case, 1 Geo. J. Legal Ethics 125 (1987).
-Skypeck, Don, Professional Ethics of Criminal Defense Lawyers: Is There A Single Solution to the Issues Raised by a Perjuring Client?, 16 Mem. St. U. L. Rev. 531 (1986).
- Lowenthal, Gary, Successive Representation by Criminal Lawyers, 93 Yale L. J. 1 (1983).
-Geer, John, Representation of Multiple Criminal Defendants: Conflicts of Interest and the Professional Responsibilities of the Defense Attorney, 62 Minn. L. Rev. 121 (1978).
-Wasserstrom, Richard, Lawyers as Professional: Some Moral Issues, 5 Human Rights 1 (1975).
-Freedman, Monroe, Professional Responsibility of the Criminal Defense Lawyer: Three Hardest Questions, 64 Mich. L. Rev. 1469 (1966).
For scholarly and practical readings about substantive crimes and defenses refer to the Recent Criminal Law News and Scholarship page of the criminal law web site. For a potpourri of brief non-scholarly but practical blurbs about procedural aspects of criminal practice check out this section of Findlaw.
Links
These are the links pages of four CCJA web sites (1), (2 - jury argument and opening statement sites), (3), (4 - primary page for criminal links that will launch you into a myriad of useful criminal law web sites).
ccja BIBLIOGRAPHY
ARTICLES and MATERIALS
CRIMINAL PRETRIAL / TRIAL PRACTICE
Copyright © 2001 Ray Moses
all rights reserved
